Pressure Injury Prevention for Critically Ill Adults
The critically ill adult patient is at increased risk of developing painful pressure injuries (1, 2). For hospitalised patients, independent of their diagnosis, pressure injuries increase length of stay and contribute to increased healthcare costs (3). Of great importance is that pressure injuries significantly impact health-related quality of life for patients (4). The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Healthcare have created a national standard to focus healthcare clinicians and organisations on this important preventable adverse event (5).
A multidisciplinary approach is required to identify and prevent pressure injuries, from both intrinsic and extrinsic causes. Predicting and preventing pressure injury will improve the quality of care and reduce the financial impact on the healthcare system.
The Pressure injury prevention for critically ill adults guideline is based on the Pan Pacific Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury (2011) [Pan Pacific CPG ] (2). The scope of this guideline is prevention of pressure injury in critically ill patients and does not include treatment of pressure injuries. Clinicians should refer to Pan Pacific CPG (2011) for further guidance and clarification of recommendations and pathophysiology of pressure injury.
Health questions at focus of clinical practice
The clinical questions underpinning this guideline include:
- what is the prevalence and incidence of pressure injuries in the adult intensive care unit?
- what are the risk factors associated with pressure injuries in the adult intensive care unit?
- what prevention and interventions are required to reduce pressure injury incidence in the adult intensive care unit?
This guideline is provided so that acute care facilities can develop local practices to support the accurate identification, assessment and associated interventions to reduce the incidence of pressure injuries in critically ill adults in the intensive care environment (individuals aged older than 18). It does not include recommendations regarding assessment, staging of pressure injuries or their associated management. Clinicians should refer the Pan Pacific CPG (2011) for further details (2).
This guideline is aimed at clinicians who care for critically ill adults across acute care hospitals in NSW . Specifically, it refers to nursing staff as this clinical practice falls within their scope of practice. Medical officers were consulted and included during consensus development.
For complete details on guideline development processes please refer to the guideline document.
Why is pressure injury prevention important in critically ill adults?
Pressure ulcers or injuries are a common consequence of critical illness and have a significant impact on patient recovery (2, 25). Because many critically ill adults have multiple risk factors eliminating pressure injuries can be difficult. However because the costs to the patient and the healthcare system are significant (3) clinicians and managers must implement programs to reduce the incidence and severity of pressure injuries. This section will briefly describe the:
- pathophysiology of pressure injury
- risk factors for critically ill adults
- pressure injury incidence and prevalence.
Readers are directed to the Pan Pacific CPG (2011) (2) for a more comprehensive overview.
Pathophysiology of pressure injury
Traditionally, pressure injuries have been attributed to compression of tissue between bony prominences and support surfaces. Current consensus however is that pressure injury development is complex and the result of a number of intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Current research indicates that the important extrinsic factors are pressure, shear and friction forces as well as the micro climate of the skin (6).
When patients are in a bed or chair different mechanical forces will be applied to tissues; these forces include pressure, shear and friction. Pressure injuries occur where these forces impair and/or damage microcirculation leading to tissue hypoxia and necrosis (2, 7).
A direct pressure injury occurs when tissue is compressed between bone and a hard surface. Where this compression exceeds capillary pressure tissue ischemia and cellular hypoxia will occur and if the pressure is not removed tissue damage and ultimately necrosis can occur (8, 9) (figure 1). Because patient risk factors vary the time to pressure injury may be as little as 30 minutes and up to four hours (10). Prevention of pressure injuries revolves around positioning patients to minimise and if possible relieve this pressure.
Figure 1: Tissue distortion due to pressure. Taken from Takahashi et al, 2010 (9). Used with permission.
Bending of the tissue lines in B (figure 1) shows that when external pressure is applied over a bony prominence, compressive, shear (distorting) and tensile (stretching) stresses occur.
Shear injuries occur because the patient’s position allows the skeleton to slide, distorting tissue and damaging cells. Prevention of shear injury involves positioning the patient so that they are less likely to slide. Areas susceptible to these injuries include the heels and sacrum (2).
Friction injuries occur because the patient’s skin is dragged across a surface burning the skin and damaging the stratum corneum (2, 7). To prevent these injuries clinicians should protect the skin by lifting patients and using protective dressings.
Ensuring a favourable microclimate is now seen as an integral component of pressure injury prevention (11). The microclimate includes the skin surface or tissue temperature and the humidity or skin surface moisture at the body-support surface interface (30). Risk factors that contribute to increased skin moisture include perspiration, incontinence or wound/fistula drainage. Excess skin moisture and relative high humidity can add to skin damage due to pressure, shear and friction. Treatment options include:
- management of incontinence
- use of barrier creams
- temperature control
- air-fluidised mattresses (2, 11).
Figure 3: Factors associated with pressure injuries (adapted from Pan Pacific CPG (2011)(2))
Risk factors for critically ill adults
The evidence base for determining pressure injury risk factors among critically ill adults is mixed with few high quality studies. In most studies it is difficult to separate the effects of critical illness and treatment from pre-existing risk factors (see table 1). It is clear however that most, if not all, critically ill adults will be at significant risk of developing a pressure injury, especially patients where delivery of oxygen to peripheral tissues is limited. Clinicians should ensure that clinical practices that restrict patient movement, such as spinal immobilisation, should be removed as quickly as possible.
Table 1 Risk factors associated with pressure injury development in critically ill adults
|Level of Risk||Risk Factor|
|Possibly a risk|
|* interaction with critical illness|
For more details please refer to Appendix 3 Risk factors for critically ill adults.
The evidence review for these recommendations was current to December 2012. Clinicians are advised to check the literature as research may have been published that change these recommendations.
Pressure injuries incidence and prevalence
The current evidence addressing the epidemiology of pressure injuries in the critically ill adult patient is limited by the poor quality of the literature, with a moderate to high level of bias associated with most studies. Pressure injuries are most prevalent in the lower half of the body including the areas over the sacrum, coccyx, buttocks and lower heels (13, 21, 22, 26). Pressure is concentrated wherever weight-bearing points come in contact with surfaces and it is reported that there is an increased prevalence with bony as opposed to non-bony pressure areas (27). However due to the conjecture on how pressure injuries begin we need to be mindful of more than just bony prominences, especially in the ICU where several invasive adjuncts may be used.
Prevalence of pressure injuries in the critically ill adult in the literature ranged from 4% to 53.4%. The incidence ranged from 12.4% to 18.7% There is a greater incidence of pressure injuries Grade 1–2 than Grade 3–4 (13, 21-23, 28). However, more recently, with the advent of the classification in 2009 (EUPAP) of the suspected deep tissue injury and unstageable pressure injury, two of the more recent studies (13, 27) do report a higher and increasing incidence of these classifications of pressure injuries.
Figure 2: Sacral pressure injury in elderly patient post spinal immobilisation. Image use by permission (29).
Figure 3: Upper lip pressure injury secondary to commercial endotracheal tube holder.
|Patients and carers|
|1.||Patients, families and careers are informed of the risks, prevention strategies and management of pressure injuries. Development of the pressure injury management plan is to occur in partnership with the patient, family and carers if appropriate.||
|2.||Use a pressure injury risk assessment scale in conjunction with a comprehensive visual assessment to determine the patient’s risk of pressure injury and to inform the development of a prevention plan.||Consensus|
|3.||The Braden scale is the recommended validated and reliable tool for assessing pressure injury risk in critically ill adults. (30, 31)||B|
Inspect all of the skin and devices attached to the patient within two hours of admission, at each repositioning and each shift change to identify indications of pressure injury including:
The skin and mucosa impacted by invasive medical devices (including but not limited to nasogastric tubes, tracheal tubes, urinary catheter, faecal management devices, nasopharyngeal airway and intravascular devices) should be inspected:
|6.||Documentation of pressure injury risk assessment scale and visual inspection should occur at a minimum of once each shift.||Consensus|
All patients are to be regularly assessed for pain, especially in relation to repositioning and in the presence of pressure injuries. If the patient has a pressure injury this should include wound pain assessment. (2)
|8.||Implement preventive strategies to protect the patient’s skin as soon as possible following admission or identification of high risk.||Consensus|
|9.||Conduct nutritional screening and assessment using validated screening and assessment tools appropriate to the population and clinical setting.2||B|
|10.||Ensure individual caloric requirements are met for patients at risk of pressure injury.2||B|
|Interventions: Support surfaces|
|11.||As a minimum use a high specification reactive (constant low pressure) support foam mattress on beds and trolleys for patients at risk of pressure injuries. No one specific high specification reactive (constant low pressure) support foam mattress is better than another. (2)||A|
|12.||Those patients classified as high risk or very high risk of pressure injury should be placed on an active (alternating pressure) support mattress. (2)||A|
|13.||Any device used to prevent heel pressure injuries should be selected and fitted appropriately to ensure pressure is adequately offloaded and hyperextension of the Achilles tendon is avoided.||Consensus|
|14.||When seated in a chair or wheelchair patients at risk of pressure injury should be placed on the appropriate reactive or active cushion.(2)||C|
|15.||Unless contraindicated at-risk patients should be repositioned at least every two hours (2, 21, 23, 28, 32, 33) even if on an active or reactive support surface. (2)||C|
When deciding on the frequency of repositioning and choice of patient position, the clinician should consider:
|17.||Reposition patients to reduce duration and magnitude of pressure over vulnerable areas, including under medical devices, bony prominences and heels. (2, 32, 34)||A|
|18.||As a minimum, position patients using 30° lateral inclination alternating from side to side or a 30° inclined recumbent position. (2, 32, 34)||C|
|19.||Patients in seated positions should ideally have pressure relief every 30-60 minutes. For specific patient groups (for example patients with spinal cord injuries) this may need to be more frequent. (2, 12)|
|20.||Clinicians should undertake a risk assessment to identity the risk of contamination and mucosal or conjunctival splash injuries during pressure injury prevention and management activities. Personal protective equipment including impervious gown or apron; goggles/mask or face shield and gloves must be worn according to this risk assessment. (36)||NSW Infection Control Policy PD_2007_036|
|21.||Clinicians must adhere to the Five Moments of Hand Hygiene. (37)||NSW Hand Hygiene Policy PD2010_058|
|22.||To reduce the risk of microbial transmission equipment utilised for each patient must be cleaned as per the Australian Guidelines for Prevention of Infection in Healthcare prior to and following use. (38)||Australian Guidelines for Prevention of Infection in Healthcare|
|Workplace health and safety|
|23.||Staff undertaking pressure injury prevention and management activities are to undertake a risk assessment of the intended activity/ies to protect the health and safety of the patient and all staff involved. (39)||NSW Work Health and Safety Act 2011|
|Governance, audit and education|
|24.||Governance structures and systems are to be in place within each ICU/HDU to support the prevention and management of pressure injuries. (40)||Standard 8|
As soon as possible after discovery pressure Injuries are to be reported and entered into the appropriate risk management tool as per the NSW Health Pressure Injury Prevention policy. (40)
NSW Health policy
|26.||Equipment and devices are available to implement effective prevention strategies for patients at risk and to manage the patients with existing pressure injuries. (40)||Standard 8|
Auditing of pressure injury prevention strategies, including:
NSW Health Policy
|28.||Education in the prevention, assessment and management of pressure injury should be provided to all health professionals.||C|
|The evidence review for these recommendations was current to December 2012. Clinicians are advised to check the literature as research may have been published that changes these recommendations.|
Grading of recommendations
|Grade of recommendation||Description|
|A||Body of evidence can be trusted to guide evidence|
|B||Body of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations|
|C||Body of evidence provides some support for recommendation/s but care should be taken in its application|
|D||Body of evidence is weak and recommendation must be applied with caution|
|Consensus||Consensus was set as a median of ≥ 7|
Grades A–D are based on NHMRC grades (41)
- Hopkins A, Dealey C, Bale S, Defloor T, Worboys F. Patient stories of living with a pressure ulcer. Journal of advanced nursing. 2006;56(4):345-53.
- Australian Wound Management Association. Pan Pacific Clinical Practice Guideline for the Prevention and Management of Pressure Injury. Australian Wound Management Association. 2011.
- Graves N, Birrell F, Whitby M. Effect of pressure ulcers on length of hospital stay. Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology. 2005;26(3):293-7.
- Gorecki C, Brown JM, Nelson EA, Briggs M, Schoonhoven L, Dealey C, et al. Impact of pressure ulcers on quality of life in older patients: a systematic review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society. 2009;57(7):1175-83.
- ACSQH. Standard 8: Preventing and Managing Pressure Injuries. Clinical Care Standards. Canberra: Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care; 2012.
- Orsted HL, Ohura T, Harding K. Pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context. 2010 [cited 6 June 2013]. In: International review Pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context [Internet]. Wounds International, [cited 6 June 2013]. Available from: http://www.woundsinternational.com/clinical-guidelines/international-review-pressure-ulcer-prevention-pressure-shear-friction-and-microclimate-in-context.
- Panel NPUAPaEPUA. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: clinical practice guideline. Washington: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009.
- Anders J, Heinemann A, Leffmann C, Leutenegger M, Pröfener F, von Renteln-Kruse W. Decubitus ulcers: pathophysiology and primary prevention. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International. 2010;107(21):371.
- Takahashi M, Black J, Dealey C, Gefen A. Pressure in context. 2010 [cited 6 June 2013]. In: International review Pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate in context [Internet]. Wounds International, [cited 6 June 2013]. Available from: http://www.woundsinternational.com/clinical-guidelines/international-review-pressure-ulcer-prevention-pressure-shear-friction-and-microclimate-in-context.
- Harris A, Leiderer R, Peer F, Messmer K. Skeletal muscle microvascular and tissue injury after varying durations of ischemia. American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology. 1996;271(6):H2388-H98.
- Clark M, Romanelli M, Reger S, Ranganathan V, Black J, Dealey C. Microclimate in context. 2010 [cited 6 June 2010]. In: International review: pressure ulcer prevention: pressure, shear, friction and microclimate A consensus document [Internet]. [cited 6 June 2010]. Available from: http://www.woundsinternational.com/clinical-guidelines/international-review-pressure-ulcer-prevention-pressure-shear-friction-and-microclimate-in-context.
- Bours GJJW, De Latt E, Halfens RJG, Lubbers M. Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Intensive Care Medicine. 2001;27:1599-605.
- Cox J. Predictors of pressure ulcers in adult critical care patients. Am J Crit Care. 2011;20(5):364-75.
- Alderden J, Whitney JD, Taylor SM, Zaratkiewicz S. Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: A retrospective review. Critical Care Nurse. 2011;31(4):30-43.
- Feuchtinger J, Halfens R, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer risk assessment immediately after cardiac surgery--does it make a difference? A comparison of three pressure ulcer risk assessment instruments within a cardiac surgery population. Nurs Crit Care. 2007;12(1):42-9.
- Manzano F, VNavarro MJ, Roldan D, Moral MA, Leyva I, Guerrero C, et al. Pressure ulcer incidence and risk factors in ventilated intensive care patients. Journal of Critical Care. 2010;25:469-76.
- Shahin ES, Dassen T, Halfens RJ. Pressure ulcer prevalence in intensive care patients: a cross-sectional study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008;14(4):563-8.
- Schuurman JP, Schoonhoven L, Keller BP, van Ramshorst B. Do pressure ulcers influence length of hospital stay in surgical cardiothoracic patients? A prospective evaluation. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(17):2456-63.
- Fernandes LM, Caliri MH. Using the Braden and Glasgow scales to predict pressure ulcer risk in patients hospitalized at intensive care units. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2008;16(6):973-8.
- Sayar S, Turgut S, Dogan H, Ekici A, Yurtsever S, Demirkan F, et al. Incidence of pressure ulcers in intensive care unit patients at risk according to the Waterlow scale and factors influencing the development of pressure ulcers. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(5):765-74.
- Nijs N, Toppets A, Defloor T, Bernaerts K, Milisen K, Van Den Berghe G. Incidence and risk factors for pressure ulcers in the intensive care unit. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(9):1258-66.
- Jenkins ML, O'Neal E. Pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence in acute care. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2010;23(12):556-9.
- Kaitani T, Tokunaga K, Matsui N, Sanada H. Risk factors related to the development of pressure ulcers in the critical care setting. J Clin Nurs. 2010;19(3-4):414-21.
- Fife C, Otto G, Capsuto EG, Brandt K, Lyssy K, Murphy K, et al. Incidence of pressure ulcers in a neuroligic intensive care unit. Critical Care Medicine. 2001;29(2):283-90.
- Powers J, Daniels D, McGuire C, Hilbish C. The incidence of skin breakdown associated with use of cervical collars. J Trauma Nurs. 2006;13(4):198-200.
- Elliott R, McKinley S, Fox V. Quality improvement program to reduce the prevalence of pressure ulcers in an intensive care unit. Am J Crit Care. 2008;17(4):328-34.
- Alderden J, Whitney JD, Taylor SM, Zaratkiewicz S. Risk profile characteristics associated with outcomes of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers: a retrospective review. Crit Care Nurse. 2011;31(4):30-43.
- Bours GJ, De Laat E, Halfens RJ, Lubbers M. Prevalence, risk factors and prevention of pressure ulcers in Dutch intensive care units. Results of a cross-sectional survey. Intensive Care Med. 2001;27(10):1599-605.
- Morris CG, McCoy EP, Lavery GG. Spinal immobilisation for unconscious patients with multiple injuries. Bmj. 2004;329(7464):495-9.
- Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL, Garcia-Fernandez FP, Lopez-Medina IM, Alvarez-Nieto C. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2006;54(1):94-110.
- Serpa LF, Santos VL, Campanili TC, Queiroz M. Predictive validity of the Braden scale for pressure ulcer risk in critical care patients. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2011;19(1):50-7.
- Baldelli P, Paciella M. Creation and implementation of a pressure ulcer prevention bundle improves patient outcomes. Am J Med Qual. 2008;23(2):136-42.
- Theaker C, Kuper M, Soni N. Pressure ulcer prevention in intensive care - a randomised control trial of two pressure-relieving devices. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(4):395-9.
- Gray-Siracusa K, Schrier L. Use of an intervention bundle to eliminate pressure ulcers in critical care. J Nurs Care Qual. 2011;26(3):216-25.
- Malbrain M, Hendriks B, Wijnands P, Denie D, Jans A, Vanpellicom J, et al. A pilot randomised controlled trial comparing reactive air and active alternating pressure mattresses in the prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers among medical ICU patients. J Tissue Viability. 2010;19(1):7-15.
- Safety Qa. Infection Control Policy: Prevention & Management of Multi-Resistant Organisms (MRO). In: Health N, editor. Sydney Australia: NSW Health; 2007.
- Manning W. Hand Hygiene. In: Health N, editor. Sydney Australia: NSW Health; 2010.
- NHMRC. Australian Guidelines for the Prevention and Control of Infection in Healthcare. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia; 2010.
- Work Health and Safety Act (2011).
- Care ACoSaQiH. National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards. Commonwealth of Australia; 2011.
- Hillier S, Grimmer-Somers K, Merlin T, Middleton P, Salisbury J, Tooher R, et al. FORM: an Australian method for formulating and grading recommendations in evidence-based clinical guidelines. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2011;11:23. PubMed PMID: 21356039.
The information on this page is general in nature and cannot reflect individual patient variation. It reflects Australian intensive care practice, which may differ from that in other countries. It is intended as a supplement to the more specific information provided by the doctors and nurses caring for your loved one. ICNSW attests to the accuracy of the information contained here but takes no responsibility for how it may apply to an individual patient. Please refer to the full disclaimer.